UA Men’s Golazo 3.0 Shorts
$20.00
- UA Tech fabric for quick-drying and ultra-soft feel
- Material wicks sweat and dries fast
- Encased elastic waistband with internal drawcord
- Side-vent hem design
- Inseam length: 7.5 inches
- No liner included
- Package Dimensions: 11.1 x 7.48 x 2.32 inches; 4.23 ounces
- Item model number: 1369058
Description
Summary:
- UA Tech Fabric: Quick-drying, ultra-soft with a natural feel.
- Material: Wicks sweat and dries fast.
- Design: Encased elastic waistband with internal drawcord, side-vent hem.
- Inseam: 7.5 inches.
- Liner: No liner included.
Additional information
Package Dimensions | 11.1 x 7.48 x 2.32 inches, 4.23 ounces |
---|---|
Item model number | 1369058 |
Department | mens |
Date First Available | April 27, 2021 |
Manufacturer | Under Armour |
Adele –
My 16-year-old son adores these shorts. The material is lightweight and they have maintained their pure white color so far.
Mob Vape –
I was hesitant to order sports shorts for my son, but since he doesn’t like trying things on in-store, Amazon was the best choice for an easy return option. The shorts fit perfectly and he loved them!!! Great purchase 🙂
Parker –
As a 6’3, 180lb individual, I ordered the large size. The shorts are on the shorter side and could have been a bit baggier around the crotch, but it wasn’t terrible. Overall, I do really like the shorts.
Greg Whearty –
Lack of pockets is a basic design flaw. Shorts should always have pockets, even swim trunks have them. Pockets are essential for the gym, not for swimming.
elizabeth –
The fit and comfort are fantastic.
Top Cat CO –
My mistake. I should have checked the reviews. What use are shorts without pockets? This information is not mentioned in the description. Update: These run a bit small.
Jeff –
I purchased these shorts based on my pant size, but they turned out too snug. I recommend going one size up according to the size chart. Also, there are no pockets, which is disappointing. The quick-dry fabric is great for running and unlikely to fade. However, they are not worth the price I paid ($25) as you’re probably just paying for the brand name.
RS –
The product is very sheer, but I like the extra attention it brings when wearing it.
ACMomma –
Loves these – they’re his favorite pairs. Not too long on my 12-year-old boy. Bought size Small.
Nicole Lafontaine –
The waistband is too tight.
Amazon –
Awesome
Tonya –
I didn’t realize it when I ordered, but these shorts are fantastic. The fit, quality, and price are excellent!
Parker –
These shorts fit great and are the top affordable option. I do wish they had pockets, but they are perfect for sports.